Bruce Stanley

Now It Is TRULY Coming Apart

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

Well well….

Project Veritas now has an on-the-record federal HHS employee blowing this whistle.

UAB Hospital in Alabama dropped their vaccine mandate after being threatened with a lawsuit. (They may attempt to play too-cute-by-half with the OSHA rules but if their original position was a loser, so is that one.)

Further, read this:

Don Williamson, president of the Alabama Hospital Association, said most hospitals in the state are not requiring vaccines for employees, WBRC reported. UAB was an exception.

Is that so?

OSHA “rules” are not federal law; they’re regulations and if issued illegally are void.

Law is made by Congress and confirmed (if signed) by the President, or if a veto is overruled.  Until that happens it’s not law, it’s a bill and legally means nothing.  Agencies can issue regulations but they must comport with the statutes — that is, the law that enables same.   This is why the CDC’s mandate was tossed and, I remind you, the courts now have notice that under Biden’s administration being handed a “nice” defeat will be met with a middle finger so the odds of a second “nice” rebuke are now zero.

I predicted when this BS started that OSHA would fail in this regard for several reasons.  Chief among them is that it is a major rule impacting millions.  This is not an emergency situation at one company or even within a single industry; it is intended to blast the entire nation’s workforce at once with a mandate.  This triggers a whole host of scrutiny requirements which are very unlikely to succeed and will be immediately challenged — along with filings asking for injunctions to bar enforcement until a ruling on the merits is made.

Said ruling will require hearings, trials, and ultimately likely go before the US Supreme Court.  It will take months if not years to go through that process.  I remind you that an injunction requires:

1. You are likely to win.  OSHA has not issued a rule of this sort of scope in a very long time, and certainly not on an emergency basis.  The entire premise of an “emergency” 18 months into this pandemic is a joke; Congress has had a year and a half to consider legislation and has not.  That standing alone like dooms the rule.  But there’s much more — in order to argue that “the vaccinated” must be protected in the workplace from “the unvaccinated” you have to admit the vaccines don’t work!  If you put that admission into writing then you just ate your own tail; the circular logic of that is obvious to anyone.  If you don’t then only consenting persons, who choose not to be vaccinated, are at risk.  Then there is the CDC Director’s direct testimony before Congress, under oath, in September 2020 in which he said masks were more effective than vaccines — and he meant surgical masks too as that’s what he held up.  When liberty interests are implicated the least-intrusive means to accomplish the goal must be chosen; the government cannot take the most intrusive, and potential permanent harm is certainly as intrusive as it gets.  Having admitted there is a better alternative OSHA will lose on that basis.  There’s much more — but you just need to demonstrate probability of a win.

2. Irreparable injury that cannot be compensated for with money.  Losing a job or worse, permanently damaging your health qualifies.  No problem there.

3. The threatened injury if the order goes into effect exceeds that if not.  The status quo is what that’s measured against; this one is somewhat of a tougher call, but likely wins.

4. The injunction is not adverse to the public interest. 100 million Americans are the public interest.  This is not a majority rule question; impacting a huge number of people certainly reaches this threshold.

The courts are not stupid.  Partisan although claimed to not be, yes.  Biased although designed to resist that, yes.  Typically deferential to the Executive (and especially Congress), yes, even though by the Constitution they’re all co-equal.  But stupid?  No.

An injunction protects the status quo.  In this case the various courts are very cognizant of the risks of allowing such a mandate through — whether with legal review or not.  Those risks include a collapse of health care in whole or part, a collapse of supply lines and knock-on effects that could include disruption of basic and necessary commodities and services.  That is a genie that, if it gets out of the bottle, may not be able to be put back in.It is one thing to allow Congress and the Executive to do this sort of thing (as was done with Obamacare); to allow just the Executive to do it is another thing entirely.

I’ll lay odds the injunction issues — and the reason you haven’t heard much from OSHA yet is because they know damn well they’re going to lose for the above reasons, and if they don’t a significant number of the nation’s hospitals may collapse.  If you have a heart attack in that situation you will die.  If any significant union or even just industry presence (e.g. Teamsters, truckers, etc.) strike in response the entire national economy could be destabilized within days or weeks.

There is no means to compel you to work.  Further, the courts are explicitly forbidden, with very few exceptions (the FRA to be specific) to interfere in what is clearly a “strike”, whether coordinated or not.  They can’t stop you from erecting the middle finger.

The entire clown world game of Biden and the jabs is about to blow up in their face.

That was my prediction originally and I stand by it.

I’ll add another prediction: The petulant 2-year-old in the White House will throw a temper tantrum.

DELIBERATE Ignorance And Death by ‘Health Care’

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

It is often said that there is some crazy conspiracy to slaughter — whether you prefer to call it “genocide” or whatever.  In the context of medicine, including the current pandemic, I argue 99% of the time its simpler.

It’s nothing more than greed.

Greed is not necessarily bad.  In measured and rational amounts it drives innovation.  I developed a crap-ton of software and designed a network around it that became MCSNet, a successful Internet company in the 1990s because of greed.  That is, by doing so I expected that I could make a lot of money.  That was not the first time I tried to make a lot of money, but it was the time it worked.  Most people who are entrepreneurs (and honest) will tell you that for every success there are three, five, sometimes ten or more failures.  “Failure” means you lose some or, in many cases all of your investment.

But unchecked greed is bad.  It becomes exploitive, even murderous.

What stops unbridled greed in the ordinary case?

Liability.

If I might otherwise claim a vial full of saline has medicinal properties and can cure a disease what will stop me is the threat of being bankrupted or even thrown in prison.

Now enter an epidemic or any other emergent crisis.

Florida and other states have laws constraining greed in times of crisis.  You can’t charge someone $10/gallon for gas when a hurricane is coming for this reason.  There are people of the libertarian pursuit that argue these laws are immoral because the invisible hand of supply and demand would otherwise come into play.  They’re only right until duress shows up.

They know it too.  Ask any of those libertarians how they feel about it if the gas station owner could see your fuel gauge, knew you were nearly out and couldn’t reach the next station and then had his pump charge you $10/gal.  Or worse, he pulls a gun on you once you pull into the station and now you have no choice but to pay the grossly-inflated price.  Is not the hurricane a gun?  That the owner of the station doesn’t pull it changes nothing; the question is about taking advantage of duress not who applies it to you.

Now let’s look at epidemics and pandemics, since both certainly count as duress, especially if you’re infected — or being led to believe you will be absent something you do (or don’t do.)

The last “serious” one before Covid that actually materialized in the US was HIV/AIDS.  What was Fauci’s proclaimed miracle drug for HIV?  AZT.

What was AZT?  A failed cancer drug — it not only didn’t work it had a nasty safety profile.  In fact it damaged immune response including that in the bone marrow, which is where long-term immunity tends to migrate to and, by being present there, results in very durable, even lifetime protection.  We knew this going in because it had been previously tested and failed in cancer patients — in fact it killed people in those trials.  In other words it was one of the overwhelming majority of molecules that drug companies invent, they look promising in test tubes and initial study, and then fail either due to ineffectiveness or outright harm when actually trialed.  Indeed what AZT had produced in those earlier trials looked an awful lot in terms of immune impact like AIDS!

But now we have a “epidemic” with no known effective treatments so off the shelf it comes and into people’s bodies.  It appears to sort of work — it delays, in some people, symptoms.  Or does it?  We’re not sure, even today, because the “placebo” arm of the trial wasn’t really blinded.  The people in the study could taste the difference between the real medication and the placebo.  Thus they knew which they were getting and this destroys the integrity of the study.  Nonetheless the drug, under heavy pressure from Fauci, was approved and used for a long time.

It didn’t actually work but the toxicity was real.  While in those years AIDS was a death sentence because the therapies we have now, which suppress (but do not eradicate) the virus in your body, didn’t exist the fact remains that a hell of a lot of money was made.  At the time AZT was the most-expensive medicine ever prescribed.

What’s worse is that in the late 1970s we discovered that a cheap, off-patent two-drug antibiotic cocktail known as Bactrim prevented PCP, a nasty and very deadly pneumonia, in children undergoing cancer treatment for leukemia.  People with AIDS often got PCP as well; it is an opportunistic infection that almost-never causes disease in immune-competent individuals, but among those who are being treated for cancer and thus severely immune-suppressed it often did, and frequently killed them.

Anthony Fauci argued vehemently that there was insufficient safety data to recommend the use of Bactrim by AIDS patients as a prophylaxis to prevent PCP, even though they were getting the disease and dying by the thousands.  Whether this was linked to his vehement promotion of AZT is, of course, unknown — but reasonable to assume.  What is known is that his advocacy against the use of said drug, which we knew worked and had saved countless leukemia patients from a nasty, choking death, resulted in 30,000 AIDS patients in American alone being shoved in the hole before the decision to bar its use in said people was overturned.

AZT was, by the facts, functionally worthless.  For every person temporarily “helped” one or more got screwed by the side effects and statistically zero people had the course of disease interrupted either way on a durable basis.

But it sure was profitable.

Now enter Covid-19.  Fauci runs an unproved line of crap on Remdesivir, claiming “clear-cut evidence” that it helps people recover from the disease.

What was Remdesivir?

It was a three-time loser!  It had been trialed as a drug against both Hepatitis-C and RSV, a viral disease that usually attacks young children and can be fatal in them.  It failed both trials.

Next it was tried against Ebola and failed there too.

But this time, with very limited evidence that it might shorten hospital stays and in fact zero evidence that it cut mortality, because we were in a pandemic that very limited evidence and no evidence that it prevents death allowed it to be given an EUA.  It’s quite-expensive too since it’s on-patent — about $3,000 to be precise for the usual course of administration plus thousands more in charges by the hospital to administer it since it is an IV medication.  Any hospital using it makes a crap-ton of money giving it to you.

Further trials occurred over the next months with the most-important one arguably being SOLIDARITY, a very large multi-national in-hospital trial that covered multiple drugs.  It failed there too; it not only had no statistical benefit on outcome it wasn’t the only one; indeed, zero of the trialed drugs when used in the hospital setting, that is, presumably late in the disease, worked — including HCQ.  I was not surprised by any of those outcomes; HCQ, for example, would not be expected to work in the hospital because at that point viral replication is complete and its mechanism of action, such as it is claimed, was against viral replication.

The problem is that Remdesivir was developed and sold as an antiviral so why did anyone think it would work in the hospital under the same circumstance — viral replication having completed — where HCQ fails?

Yet even today it will be given to you if you check into a hospital with Covid-19.  It is part of the “official protocol.”

It is, on the data, a useless drug just makes people money at your expense.  But most failed drugs aren’t just useless since all drugs have potential harms associated with them.  This one is especially nasty because one of the side effects that came out of the early trials was a roughly 1-2 in 10 risk of at least temporarily damaging or destroying kidney function.  

Now think about this for a minute.  You’re in the hospital fighting a potentially-deadly infection.  You get a drug that, 10-20% of the time on the data damages or destroys your kidney function.  Most people think the kidneys are all about removing uric acid and thus creating piss.  That’s only part of what they do.

In addition they:

• Control the acid/base balance of your blood.  This goes out of range, you die.
  
• Control the water balance of your blood.  Guess what happens if that goes out of range?  Uh huh.  Specifically, that can cause acute pulmonary edema and compromise lung function.  You weren’t already choking to death before that happened by chance, were you?
  
• Controls electrolyte balance.  While some of that is survivable even wildly out of whack there are specific parts of electrolyte balance that you cannot survive being materially-disrupted — to name one, potassium which is utterly crucial for neural conduction.  That being out of range can literally give you an immediate heart attack by interrupting or damaging the neural signaling from your brain to your heart muscle.  I think you can figure out what comes next if you suffer cardiac arrest.
• Removes toxins. Not just uric acid; a whole host of other things including many drug byproducts.  Needless to say poisoning by excess levels of many of those results in…. yeah, you got it, death.
  
• Control of blood pressure. Yeah, that ain’t good if it goes out of range, right?
  
• Controls the process of red blood cell production in the marrow by producing a hormone called erythropoietin.  No red blood cells, no oxygen transport.  You die (granted, probably not fast enough for it to be in play here.)
  
• And a critical part in the metabolic pathway by which Vitamin D is used by the body.  What do we know is associated with bad Covid-19 outcomes?  Severely deficient serum Vitamin D levels.

Anyone who runs dialysis for other people as a nurse or who has had to have it done knows damn well that the process is not just about removing what would otherwise be piss.  Oh sure, that’s part of it — but it’s a complex dance when you try to replace that which the body does on its own with external process and doing so requires a crap-ton of attention and replacement of those functions.  When you are under severe disease stress the odds that this sort of dysfunction and the inability to match natural response artificially, even in the short term and the best of skill, will kill you is quite high.

As a result it is entirely reasonable to expect that if you give Remdesivir, with a known 10-20% rate of significant kidney disruption rate to a group of people who are ill enough to be hospitalized it might well kill 10% of those it was given to via this toxicity.  Therefore in order for the drug to be considered worth the risk it would have to save statistically more people than it harms by enough to produce a hazard ratio that was materially in favor of the treatment and the confidence band would have to conclusively show that.

The data from SOLIDARITY said that isn’t the case.

It gets worse.

Death from the above can be determined at autopsy.  Dysregulation of the first several of those items will produce differentiated edema, particularly in the lungs.  That is, excess fluid.  This is immediately obvious on autopsy and is wildly different than what is apparent if coagulation killed the patient, which is typically what results with Covid pneumonia that leads to death.

They aren’t looking, on purpose, and in fact people who have specifically asked for autopsies are being refused.

If you did 100 of them on Covid hospitalized deaths, all of which got Remdesivir and found half of them had evidence of systemic harm from the drug well……

History rarely repeats, but it frequently rhymes.  Fauci, at the same time arguing for Remdesivir, an on-patent and expensive medication along with mandatory vaccination, argued against, and continues to argue against the early use of Ivermectin, HCQ and even Budesonide, three drugs for which we have decades of safety data and which are used routinely by huge numbers of people — we have history on close to 4 billion human doses consumed for Ivermectin, millions of RA and Lupus sufferers use HCQ daily and Budesonide is commonly prescribed as a maintenance drug for daily use by asthmatics.

Speaking of vaccination we’ve known for decades that “leaky” vaccines — that is, ones which do not sterilize you against infection and thus allow you to “carry” a disease and not get sick are dangerous.  If used when a disease is present in the community they turn vaccinated people into carriers and spreaders of the disease who have no idea they’re passing the love around to others.  Eventually the disease finds a person it can make sick, whether their vaccine failed or they are not vaccinated.

We learned this the hard way decades ago with DTP.  Virtually every child was — and is — vaccinated against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis.  Pertussis, otherwise known as “whooping cough” is a nasty disease that frequently kills infants — and is dangerous to basically anyone who gets it.  Anyone who is symptomatic for it is instantly obvious due to its characteristic and violent coughing and “whoop” respiratory disturbance, which is also frequently associating with vomiting.

The DTP shots had a fairly nasty adverse effect profile and, what’s worse, there were quality control problems with insuring the correct amount was in a given dose.  There were suspicions that the pertussis component caused permanent brain injury in children.  People sued.  The manufacturers withdrew the DTP vaccine, liability insurance became prohibitively expensive and the manufacturers threatened not to make any more of the shots — ever.

What did Congress do in 1986?  Immunize the manufacturers from liability.  Instead VAERS (which we have today) was established, alleged “mandatory reporting” (which we know is a joke in the context of Covid-19 shots) was instituted for health  providers that administered vaccines and an arbitration system was established for alleged injury claims.

But what happened with pertussis itself — you know, the disease?

Well, on the data, the vaccines were working.  There were only 1,010 cases of pertussis across the entire United States in the mid 1970s.  Rather than solve the quality control problems the industry, now immune from lawsuit, in full cooperation with the CDC changed the vaccines to “DTaP”, which is what is given today.  That change  was broadly rolled out through the 1990s in the United States.  “a” stands for acellular; in other words, not containing the actual material of the disease.  DTaP was easier to make and, while somewhat more-expensive also did not suffer from the quality control challenges of DTP.

That’s good, right?  Improve the product!  Why VAERS and everything that came from the lawsuits and such is a victory!

Uh, no, it isn’t.

“The second generation of vaccine turned out to have an unanticipated limitation, and that has been probably the main engine driving the resurgence,” says Gill, who is lead author on a review article on the resurrection of whooping cough, published in the journal F1000 Research. Gill and his colleagues suspect that the vaccine, while preventing symptoms from pertussis infections for some time, has little impact on preventing people from becoming “colonized” with the bacteria, meaning they are asymptomatic carriers of the disease and are still capable of infecting others.

Why we would never do the same stupid thing again, not with an endemic disease that comes around here and there and screws some people, but rather into the maw of an epidemic that is screwing people by the score, right?

Oh wait — we did exactly that and what’s worse is that we are now mandating such abject stupidity for health care workers and enlisting countless people, including but certainly not limited to them, in marching around virtue signaling others to get jabs that history tells us will make the situation worse! 

Of course profit and the removal of liability from the manufacturers has nothing to do with this, right?  Why if they were liable then you could sue and introduce as evidence that we have known for decades on the data that when we did the same thing with pertussis we screwed people and turned a nearly-eradicated disease into one that makes a hell of a lot of people sick!

Now I want you to look in here.  Get out Excel, you’re going to need it.

Or just look at my county and the latest figures off the CSV file.

358 people total hospitalized and of them 227 died thus far.

Sixty-three percent of the people who go into that hospital (there’s only one in this county) for Covid-19 come out in a box?

How about Knox?

1,707 hospitalizations and 784 deaths.

Forty-six percent of those who go into one of the several hospitals in that much-larger county for Covid-19 come out in a box?

By the way on March 1st — before Delta — our hospital had killed 61% on a run-rate basis so no, this is not a “Delta” problem.

It is a post-vaccine acceleration at a gross rate, however: On January 1st, when statistically zero people had gotten vaccines, they had killed 43% of those who went in with Covid-19.

Indeed in Sevier County if you take the May 1st number of hospitalizations as a “baseline” (291) and deaths (175) and subtract that off you find that from May 1st to now 127 people went into the hospital for Covid-19 and 52 came out in a box thus far for a “kill rate” of 41% since the “advent” of Delta.  How you like those odds?  4 out of 10?

How about from July 1st to now, when basically everything is allegedly “Delta” and the vaccines may be either wearing off or worse, promoting more-severe disease?

304 in the hospital, 179 dead on that day.  In other words 54 hospitalizations in total and of them 48 died thus far.

THE *******S AT OUR COUNTY HOSPITAL SENT 89% OF ADMISSIONS HOME IN A BOX SINCE JULY 1ST!  You think there’s no SIGNAL in there?

Yes, this is a bit unfair as there’s overlap; that is, if you die the second day of the 2-month window you probably were infected and admitted some time previous. Can we correct for that?  Yes; offset the two by 10 days, which likely gets you into the median area for admission .vs. death (that is, on average it likely takes you about 10 days to die if you’re going to die.)

So let’s do that; we’ll go with June 20th for the start date for admissions.  That’s 304 and, on deaths, still 179 — in fact on June 21st Sevier County recorded its previous one death.

I still get 54 admissions from June 20th to the 16th of September and 48 deaths, for a kill rate of…. 89%.  And this understates the rate, in all probability, since if I cut off admissions on the 16th I should carry forward deaths for another 10 days,  If we go back 10 days on admissions to the 6th, however, we get an identical count so we shall see if the deterioration gets worse over the next  week.   Oops.

Now do you understand why I was willing to do whatever I had to early, often and hard to avoid giving those pieces of crap a nearly 9 in 10 crack at killing me when I got infected at the beginning of August?  I succeeded, obviously, or you would not be reading this.

If I had to go and the option was this county rather than just laying down and being murdered so I could be held up as another “unvaxxed death” on CNN I might have chosen instead to do something that could send my soul to Hell.  When facing St. Peter this is what I would have told him:

“See all these souls immediately in front of me? I intentionally made them come here today because they were, with a 90% certainty, imminently going to commit murder upon both my person and others in addition to those who they murdered before me.  I did it to terminate that 90% kill rate, ending their orgy of death along with my life which I willingly spent.  I’m well-aware of God’s commandment “thou shalt not murder”, the serious nature of violating that law and the just and eternal punishment for doing so, but I submit that it is not murder to stop someone who is actively committing homicide, even if it results in their death.  This is especially true when the net number of lives that are ended decreases as a result of your actions, and a 90% slaughter rate across dozens of people over a couple month’s time, which they can no longer continue, meets that criteria.  On the evidence I sincerely believe these people could have kept half or more of those souls who preceded mine here alive and their failure to do so was not an accident — they did it on purpose out of willful ignorance, arrogance, spite, promoting a political agenda and greed.  Given that you have absolute knowledge of whether I am right or wrong then if I was wrong and my actions did violate the 5th Commandment, a mortal sin, I humbly accept my just punishment in eternal Hellfire.”

You think I have any respect for anyone who claims that “oh this is so terrible” when they’ve done nothing about the Elephant in the room — they own and execute those protocols for these patients and it is absolutely clear they are either doing nothing to save people or worse, actively killing them!

That’s like asking me if I had respect for Jeff Dahmer because a few of the people he targeted managed to figure out what he had in mind and escaped having their heads wind up in his refrigerator.

How’s Knox County (much larger and right next door) look?  1707 HX, 784 dead as of 9/16.  What was it on 7/1?  1434 and 649, respectively.

273 more hospitalizations and 135 more deaths, or a slaughter rate of 50%.  Better odds than my county?  Yeah, now its a revolver with three cartridges in it out of six holes instead of nine out of ten.  Oh by the way their rate of death from the start of the pandemic to January 1st was 343/960 or 36%.  That’s going the wrong way too, isn’t it — and not by a little either.

How is it that with all these vaccines injected across susceptible people who are most-likely to get whacked by this virus we’ve gone from roughly 4 in 10 people dying who are admitted to more than double that rate and near-certain death?  Why is it that a much-larger county right next door with multiple medical centers, while doing better, is still going the wrong way?  Given that the data out of every place with reasonable statistics says that Delta is somewhat less lethal on a case fatality rate basis, and that all the really easy to kill people are already dead as they died either in early 2020 or the winter what the Hell is going on here?  We already know one hospital (but not in this area) was caught deliberately trying to lie for that purpose as someone taped the Zoom call where it happened and leaked it online.

It isn’t because we wildly deployed a vaccine strategy that is identical to the one that failed for pertussis and we knew why it failed before this pandemic began, was it?  Isn’t it lovely that we exempted everyone from liability for doing something that on the data was demonstrably dangerous and now, on the objective evidence as documented by the percentage of hospital admissions ending in a pine box is blowing up in our face?

Oh, and since we’re talking about failed strategies, has anyone updated the adverse event risk on Remdesivir?  Nope.  What if those original trial results were skewed by illness severity and in fact the drug is a lot more dangerous than it appears?  What if, under increasing levels of systemic stress, that drug kills the majority or even nearly all of those people?

Given that the data continually has shown there is no mortality benefit where is the data from hospitals that do not use it and how do those compare on a matched-cohort basis with those that do?  Do such hospitals in the United States exist?

I cannot find a single scientific publication that lays this out; if you have it I’d love to see a link to it in the comments.

Do we have a bunch of people dying of secondary bacterial pneumonia and not Covid-19 at all yet again, nobody is looking because there is a playbook and it does not include looking for and treating anything else if the person has a positive Covid-19 test?  The use of steroids is shown to help dampen inflammatory response (and thus is common and helpful in hospitalized Covid patients) but systemic steroids also set up the potential for bacterial colonization by suppressing immune response.  Is “The magic PCR 8-ball” saying “POSITIVE!” a barrier to looking for anything else that may be going on?  Since nobody is doing autopsies you will never get caught if you don’t bother looking — is that why all these people are dying?

What the hell is going on here?  Is it simply that we were stupid with our jabs because we couldn’t come up with a sterilizing vaccine for a coronavirus as there has never been a successful one before so the do something, even if it might harm in the interests of “Warp Speed” won and now we’re screwed and yet nobody can sue over that which, objectively examined, was STUPID?

This sort of bull**** would never work absent the PREP Act’s liability shield and the actions of HHS in the first weeks of the pandemic that specifically exempted hospitals, physicians and others from liability provided they use drugs and protocols the FDA and CDC list as approved whether under regular order or EUA — and nothing else.   I remind you that not only did Trump’s HHS do that but Biden has refused to rescind it — and he has the power to do so immediately by direct order.

But for that liability shield the relatives of the deceased would order an autopsy be performed and if in fact evidence was present Remedesivir and not Covid-19 killed Granny, or the hospital refused to look for anything else once the PCR test came back positive and in fact she died of bacterial pneumonia they didn’t look for and did not treat everyone involved would be sued to beyond the orbit of Mars.

Would we have even gotten beyond publication of the SOLIDARITY trial when it was conclusively demonstrated across a very large data set that statistically speaking it did not keep anyone from dying before that the thrice-failed drug was labeled a four time loser and binned?

Given what we know about this drug and the history of using dangerous and net-harmful pharmaceuticals that our “wonderful” health care system, regulators and others all the way down to doctors and nurses running around with virtue-signaling bull**** on their T-shirts promote and even demand go into patients what sort of possible reason would there be to not autopsy some representative sample of those who die and find out with reasonably medical certainty what’s going on, especially when death rates for those hospitalized in certain areas have more than doubled in the last couple of months?

Other than “health care professionals” being made more self-absorbed in their virtue signaling while the hospital and drug company collects $3,000 per corpse for a drug that actually may have killed them, that is.

The math on this is nasty, the basic biological functionality of the kidneys and this drug’s known harm to same strongly suggests serious trouble and yet I cannot find one hospital that has sought to discover the truth via autopsy and either prove or disprove that this drug is in fact killing and killed a huge percentage of those who died in the hospital with Covid-19 — or whether something other than the virus was responsible for their death.  If you have said study and autopsies let’s see them.  I’ve looked and can’t find any evidence they exist.

It’s all about the money and “virtue” of those nurses and doctors once again — isn’t it?  Just like the original Tik-Tok dancing nurses?

The more death the more “virtuous” they believe they are in doing “God’s Work”?

FACTS THAT ARE TRIVIALLY DISCOVERABLE BUT INTENTIONALLY NOT LOOKED FOR BE DAMNED.

The Sad Reality: Civil War, Or A Divorce, Is Coming

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

It’s sad, really.

Yesterday should have been the end of it.  Perhaps it will be, but I sort of doubt it, although it likely is the beginning of the end.

The FDA committee rejected “booster” Covid shots for anyone not over 65 or at severe, high risk.  Listening to just part of the people who presented their cases on the negative side was ridiculously chilling; the data made clear that in young, non-morbid people the jabs are more-dangerous than the disease, which means the EUA in non-morbid young people was never appropriate in the first place and should have been withdrawn as soon as that was detected.  But the real stunner came when the FDA admitted it was originally going to use only the US “breakthrough” case rate as given by the CDC.  In May of this year the CDC deliberately stopped tracking infections that did not lead to hospitalization among the vaccinated, thus making the jabs look far more effective than they are, an intentional act that was intended to and did destroy data integrity.  The FDA changed their instructions to the panel and allowed consideration of the UK and Israeli data, and that was the end of that since both showed that the jabs were and are increasingly worthless with time and, much worse, that boosters didn’t work in Israel; what looked like improvement when they initiated the program quickly reversed with a few short weeks.

There have been plenty of attempted hit pieces in the media too.  WXYZ in Detroit, which went fishing for stories of people unvaccinated dying, clearly intending to present a piece of yellow journalism, got more than they bargained for.  182,000+ responses of people who were injured or killed by the vaccines, to be precise, instead of what they asked about.  The funny thing is that the station is one that, in the past I’ve known to produce good journalism; they made somewhat of a name for themselves by busting auto workers who were taking their lunch break to down a six-pack while smoking what appeared to be a joint — and then, of course, going back to the plant to clock in for the afternoon.

182,000 dead or seriously injured is a hell of a lot of people folks.

There are a very large number of people out there who think the answer is to “stab everyone.”  Some of them are health-care workers who get their news from CNN or Fauci and can’t be bothered to read source material.  Few of those health care workers are old enough to remember what Fauci did with AIDS, Bactrim and the 30,000 dead gay men that directly resulted from his “advocacy” against the use of same. History is written so you don’t have to live through stupidity to learn from it, but apparently reading is no longer part of the list of expectations of citizens in the general public, say much less professionals.  One of the T-shirts running around is making the argument for “stab everyone” and which marks the wearer as fundamentally ignorant of both history and fact, which I saw last night locally, is available from multiple sources.

The irony of it is that of course it places Covid at the top, but conflates two things — sterilizing vaccines which are not a bad thing at all and while they have both risks and benefits and intentionally non-sterilizing ones that are profoundly unsafe when a disease is endemic or, much worse, epidemic.

Specifically that shirt has both diphtheria and pertussis on it, which I noted the other day we intentionally changed the vaccine formula on and as a result screwed lots of young kids.  By the 1970s the United States was all but free of pertussis.  In young children it’s an especially-nasty disease because along with the classic “whoop” that comes with the cough it often produces vomiting, and aspirated pneumonia is nasty. Think about inhaling hydrochloric acid, which is basically what happens (along with whatever else was in your stomach) if you aspirate vomit.  Even worse in infants for reasons not-well understood it sometimes produces respiratory arrest instead of coughing which, unless immediately detected kills the baby outright.

But as I noted Friday we deliberately ignored what we learned with pertussis.  Specifically, the disease was basically eradicated in the United States, even though to actually do so is impossible, as is the case with tetanus, since the disease-causing organisms can survive beyond humans.  Any disease that can do that, either because its a bacterium or a virus with animal reservoirs, cannot be eradicated short of destroying all life on the planet.  That obviously includes you, for those who are intellectually-challenged.

We had, with sterilizing vaccination (DTP) gotten the case rate down to about 1,000 cases a year in the entire United States.  Then we changed to DTaP in the 1990s, a non-sterilizing vaccine that, as we also found out a couple of decades later, wears off because its immunity is narrowly-focused exactly as is the case for the Covid-19 jabs that also generate a narrow and partial antibody response.  What happened?  The case rate went up by more than twenty times.

You’d think we would have learned from that particularly given that pertussis (whooping cough), while endemic in the United States, isn’t all that huge of a thing.  Oh don’t get me wrong — if you roll the “1” it’s a pretty nasty disease and when it happens to an infant it kills them about 4% of the time and about 1% of the time in kids from 1-5.  That’s ugly, particularly considering that Covid-19 has managed to kill only about 400 kids under the age of 18 since the start of the pandemic.

If pertussis was anywhere near as virulent as Covid-19 the local coffin company would be making caskets for those under 3′ tall at a rate wildly exceeding that of Covid-19 among all ages.  Thank God it isn’t but that lesson should have ended the damned debate on non-sterilizing vaccines in any disease that is circulating in the population before it started.

Instead we have nurses running around off-duty with that shirt on, which serves to advocate for not only the stupidity we undertook with pertussis which was driven by the refusal of manufacturers to make a stand-alone tetanus shot — the original DTP vaccine had a much higher adverse event risk and in adults only the tetanus part required re-application.  Since you can’t get just a tetanus booster the public health argument gets complex since beyond childhood basically everyone needed nothing other than the tetanus component.  Thus the number harmed from the shot can exceed the benefit and that is why we changed it rather than the government producing under contract that which private industry refused to do.

What’s worse is that there is now evidence that the pertussis protection from the jab we switched to also wears off!  It takes longer and, in adults pertussis is very rarely fatal but you can both get it and kill an infant since that vaccine is non-sterilizing.  The original DTP vaccine (which I got as a kid) produced durable, sterilizing and broad immunity to pertussis.  Not-so with DTaP which is what we jab all kids with today and what they’re stuck with as DTP is no longer produced or used in the US.

Never mind that a huge percentage of said nurses are obese themselves and we’ve all known for a year and a half that this virus whacks fat people much more often than those who aren’t.  Anyone could have lost close to 100lbs over the last 18 months without any extraordinary effort at all.  A 500 calorie deficit down the pie hole daily, a 500 calorie increase in expenditure or some combination that adds to it would have done it.  While 500 calories of increase in expenditure is quite a bit (about 4 miles of running per day) half that isn’t hard at all; a mile or two of walking coupled with less than two fewer cans of soda down the pie hole would have done it.  It was a personal decision to not do so but that refusal is not my problem — its theirs.

So what are we doing now?

Killing people and we have medical workers who refuse, deliberately to engage in any sort of retrospection and a look at the historical evidence including the CDC’s own admission as to the risks from whooping cough — which deliberately ignoring that they were part of driving that which led to a twenty times increase in case rate — on purpose!  Nearly half of infants who get it wind up in the hospital.

In fact in 2012 it was nearly fifty times the former rate!

Oh, and what do doctors do when someone gets it in a household?  Why, they send antibiotics home for everyone else in the house to try to prevent it from spreading.

What don’t we do with Covid?

The same damn thing, even though we know how to cut it off, I recommended it in December and now, with India, we know it works because they did it and shut Covid down across a population of more than 200 million people.

To quote from Desert Review, as what I (and a few others) proposed is now conclusively proved; read this however many times you must until it sinks into your thick skull:

A 97% decline in Delhi cases with Ivermectin is decisive – period. It represents the last word in an epic struggle to save lives and preserve human rights. This graph symbolizes the victory of reason over corruption, good over evil, and right over wrong. It is as significant as Davids victory over Goliath. It is an absolute vindication of Ivermectin and early outpatient treatment. It is a clear refutation of the WHO, FDA, NIH, and CDC’s policies of “wait at home until you turn blue” before you get treatment.

Yet we still have so-called “health care workers”, including some right here in my immediate area, who claim the answer to Covid is to do the very same thing that caused cases of whooping cough to go up by a factor of FIFTY over its previous rate instead of that which crashed Covid infections by 97%.

Never mind that the NEJM article proves that the vaccines are doing this just by simple mathematics.  The NEJM article, I remind you, showed that 83% of the American population had immunity in their blood to Covid-19 in May; 20% from infection and the balance from vaccination.  That level of immunity makes a widespread epidemic impossible yet it happened and is happening.  This is only possible if the vaccines at best don’t work to cut off infection and transmission and they might be enhancing disease.

This is a matter of mathematical fact; a virus must find a new host or it dies out and the basic formula for that has been known for decades; 1 – 1/R0 = Herd Immunity Threshold

So if Delta has an R0 of 6 (which I doubt by the way; the CDC claims it but the UK data says no, it’s materially less but somewhat higher than the original R0 of 3.0 for Covid’s wild strain) then we get 1 – 1/x = 83% or, from basic algebra which any nurse or doctor damn well ought to be able to do you get  -1/x = 0.83 – 1.

You can solve that equation from here for the suppressed level of R0, right?

This means that in May there was no national epidemic possible for an R0 of 5.88 or less unless the jabs don’t work or enhance disease.  Mathematics was not wrong in the time of Galileo — he was right and the priests were full of crap — and it isn’t wrong now.

Civil war or a partition and divorce between the people of this nation?

When those who are alleged “health” care workers and politicians are acting identically to those who persecuted Galileo because he scientifically proved the Earth was not the center of the universe, and who have as their high priests the very organization that multiplied the rate of a serious infectious disease by a factor of FIFTY by putting politics and pharma ahead of health resulting in the death of many people who are right now having tubes shoved down their throat and their veins filled with a damned dangerous drug, specifically remdesivir, and that results in a huge wave of DEATH then yeah, that’s where we’re headed unless they cut that crap out.

There’s NO indication they will.

I want nothing to do with these people and do not willingly engage with them.  If they want to sit in a bar and drink beer where people who see it the other way and can be bothered to do basic algebra happen to be, that’s fine.  You have a right to be intentionally ignorant.  I’m perfectly happy to consider such people nothing more or less than a large rock consuming an equal amount of space; that’s the peaceful option.  You do you, I do me; leave me the Hell alone and I will do likewise.  At worst you’ll get a smirk when you display said insanity in public on your clothing.

But they’re not content to do that and leave me alone as I experienced once again last night.  Not at all, and that’s the problem.  If one group refuses to leave the other alone and repeatedly continues to accost the other on an escalating basis eventually those demanding you perform a dangerous act that, on the evidence and the fundamental laws of mathematics is making Covid worse are going to turn to violence and, when they do, that’s a one-way door as once THEY start that crap (and from the pattern of escalation it appears they will do exactly that) they will not be able to turn it back off.

Ivermectin .vs. Covid In A Poor, High-Density State

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

Uttar Pradesh, India — 33 districts in that state have been declared “Covid-free.”

Well, ok, not that entirely the entire state is Covid free, but close enough.

241 million people, 199 active cases.  The positive test rate is currently 0.01%.  In other words, statistically zero.

Why?

It’s not vaccination; statistically-speaking none of their people have been vaccinated while, according to JAMA’s study approximately 62% of the population of the US showed vaccine-generated antibodies as of May.

I bet you can figure out how they did it and it will only require one word too.

If you’re having trouble, well, read here because it’s fully explained and that one word is not vaccines.

Tell me again why hospitals, doctors and so-called “public health experts” still have a microphone to use; as I advocated many, many months ago and, based on the evidence, expected would work Utter Pradesh has cut off forward transmission of the virus with a cheap and safe drug.

No transmission, no epidemic.  Period.  It’s that simple.

This is a state that has a per-capita GDP of about $1,000, a total GDP of $240 billion, 40% of the citizens are below the poverty line, well above average for the nation as a whole.

It is a poor state and worse, the most-populous in the nation and has extremely high-density cities — the most-fertile environment imaginable for a pandemic virus — yet they slayed Covid with a cheap, wildly-available drug.

Time to hold people accountable — personally.

Hospital administrators, doctors, politicians, Fauci, both past and present Directors of the CDC, the FDA, school administrators, college provosts, CEOs who have been jab-happying their employees and every single screaming Karen on social media.

PERSONAL accountability NOW.

I told you how to do this right here, in the US — on December 7th, 2020 for a literal $2 per person infected and in the same household with someone who is.  That was more than nine months and several hundred thousand lives ago.  There was no reason for the United States to take any further “spike” in cases, hospitalizations and death beyond that date.  I laid it out on the evidence and in fact that’s exactly what this state in India did.  I was right — all the rest of these jackasses were wrong, they’re still wrong and they must PAY for what they’ve done and the people who were slaughtered by their hand.

Which would you rather do and which is the correct path for us to take?

Something that once injected you cannot change your mind on, which has people all over social media posting their stories of heart attacks, strokes, odd clotting problems, heart inflammation in healthy teens and more and then get the Covid-19 anyway and end up in the hospital as did Oscar de la Hoya and Jesse Jackson?  And, I remind you, that the manufacturer (Pfizer) now admits loses potency over time which I bet they knew or at least suspected last fall and did not disclose — and thus, in case you haven’t figured it out yet, means it does not stimulate long-term immune system recognition and thus is more-akin to a drug than a vaccine.   In the alternative should you choose to use a drug at first sign of trouble yourself or if anyone in your household gets Covid-19 that costs $2 and has a forty year safety record, is, on that record 100x safer than Tylenol, has all but eliminated River Blindness in multiple nations and has had nearly 4 billion doses dispensed for human consumption over that forty years?  Oh by the way if we follow the protocol I set forth in December and which India used we will largely cut off transmission in households which the CDC admits is the primary means by which people get infected — and as a result epidemic propagation is cut off and far fewer people get seriously sick or die.

One path has led one of the wealthiest nations in the world with an alleged “excellent” health care system taking a huge spike in infections in the middle of the summer when, according to JAMA, we should have enough immunity among the population (83% as of May) that said spike was impossible.  But it happened and that it did is extremely strong evidence that the jabs are at best worthless and might, in some cases, be making the infection worse.

The other path led a state (of a larger nation) with a per-capita GDP one-sixtieth of the United States, a nation where the median annual per-capita income is approximately $1,000 US, where more than forty percent of all city dwellers live in poverty — a state of 241 million people all packed together with no money,  and no resources — Satan’s Kitchen for a pandemic virus where in May the media was lamenting that they literally had nothing available in the way of hospital resources — today sitting with fewer than 200 active cases of Covid-19.

No more bull**** folks — unless you or someone you love would like to die this fall and winter.

Yes, They Are Insane

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

So CamelToe is nuts too.

“By vaccinating the unvaccinated, increasing our testing and masking, and protecting the vaccinated, we can end the pandemic. That’s exactly what we are committed to doing.” – Kamala Harris

Never before in history has there been a need to “protect the vaccinated.”

There isn’t one now unless the jabs not only don’t work, in some percentage of people who took them they make infection worse — and they know it.

What do they know and aren’t telling you?

The point of a vaccine is to gain personal protection.  I have written about this many time; the premise of “herd immunity” is in fact why epidemic spread of any pathogen stops being a material concern but the decision to take a vaccine is a personal one, despite all the screaming over the decades by various idiots.

Yes, I’ve had most of the “ordinary” vaccines.  So has my daughter; the risk:benefit analysis was clear and there was plenty of longitudinal, long-term data to back that analysis up.  With these jabs for Covid-19 there is zero long-term data and there won’t be for a couple more years, but the short and intermediate term data we do have says that in many people the jabs are more-dangerous than the disease, and this is particularly true now that we know they do not provide lasting protection and fade off or even make you more likely to get infected after six or so months have passed.

I got into this with back when the HPV vaccine was attempted to be “mandated” for teens.  HPV is a viral disease that in men is usually “silent” but in women it can cause cervical cancer.  It is spread by sexual contact.  Schools were talking about mandating it.

Now think about this for a minute: Is not a school that mandates such a shot saying that sexual contact is perfectly ok on their campus?  Yes indeed they are, since what happens off campus is none of their ******ned business.  I reminded them that promoting underage persons having sex is, in many cases, a felony.

That argument shut them up fast.

So why not take it anyway, you might ask?

Because occasionally it causes Guillain-Barre syndrome, and in some percentage of people who have that happen the damage is permanent or even lethal.

There is no way to predict in advance who will have that happen to them and as such this is a personal, adult choice.  It comes with extreme (even if uncommon) risks and therefore is only reasonable if the actual recipient gives informed consent and at the same time has full, personal responsibility for the consequencesif said “adverse events” occur.

And here’s the other part of it: Since HPV is a sexually-transmitted disease, other than by rape there are in fact people who are at zero risk.  A celibate person is the obvious example.  So is a monogamous, virginal couple right up until one of them violates monogamy.  While virginal couples are basically unheard of as you get older among teens they’re not uncommon at all and some percentage of them go on to be monogamous for life.

Yes, I know, that’s a quaint and “old fashioned” notion.  It is nonetheless true and exposure to risk for no benefit is stupid.

Further, beyond the burden of permanent lifetime support for a son or daughter who I had injected with something that caused a lifetime disability there is also the mental burden that would come with it when I knew the balance of harms was stupid and did it anyway.  That would be suicide-inducing for me and should be for any other parent who actually gives a crap about their kids.

Of course many so-called parents don’t give a crap that their kids are whoring (or “studding”) around — or worse.

Even more-damning is that (at the time) it only covered one strain of HPV; all the others could still screw you, and there was more than one circulating strain.  This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation because believing you’re safe when you’re not alters behavior in negative ways, even if only at the margin.  If you must contemplate the fact that ****ing that cute boy might lead to permanent sterility in the best case, and could kill you (cervical cancer, if you get it, means no more kids from that point forward, obviously since they have to remove it and if it spreads before being caught you’re ****ed) then maybe your “willing to screw” rate goes down just a bit, especially if the guy in question has a reputation of poking anything that walks on two legs.  Since sex comes with a myriad of potential adult consequences promoting wise choices, as I see it, outweighed the nebulous benefits and potential serious harms.

Therefore it was my decision that when my daughter reached the age of 18 years she was free to make that decision on her own.  While there was certainly the risk of infection prior to that point it was outweighed by the fact that this is an adult decision with adult consequences and, other than by******there is nothing to fear beyond the consequences of personal, voluntary choice.

Incidentally this situation has in many ways gotten worse.  The serious adverse event rate has risen dramatically as they’ve included more strains in the jab and is now estimated at about 1 in 140.  May I remind you that the cervical cancer rate on a US national basis, which is the bad outcome this shot allegedly mitigates, is about 6/100,000 women per year?  That means the NNT/NNH ratio (number necessary to treat to prevent one bad outcome .vs. number necessary to treat that causes harm) is upside down (more-likely to harm you than help you) for a huge percentage of the population.  While this jab is arguably worth it for a sex worker it is not for virtually everyone else as even over a lifetime your risk of serious harm from the jab exceeds the probability of benefit.  Yet this particular vaccine is still pushed — hard — by all manner of medical jackasses who can’t be bothered to do basic four-function arithmetic!

[Sidebar: Back when I was of that age the fact that you could not get birth control beyond condoms until you were 18 — no physician would write a script for chemical birth control for an adolescent.  Since rubbers are both nowhere near effective enough to be reasonable “proof” against pregnancy and at the same time provide some value against STDs that was quite the deterrent to wildly screw around while at the same time providing some protection against STD spread if you did it anyway.  If you knocked up your girlfriend her father might well shove a shotgun in your face and demand you marry her, but even if it didn’t go that far it was going to be a very bad time for both of you, and you both knew it.  Yeah, I had fun — but that possibility was always in the back of both my mind and hers.  While at the time I certainly didn’t like it in retrospect that was a good thing, not a bad one.]

How does this all apply to what’s going on now?

Actually, quite a lot of it applies.

Let’s start with this: The data on the Covid jabs say they offer more harm than benefit in young healthy boys.  Heh — that sounds like the HPV shot, doesn’t it?  That’s because it is.  Mandating them is thus not just malpractice and negligence it’s manslaughter.

It doesn’t end there.

While you can excuse Biden for being a demented old coot and unable to think before his mouth opens you can’t make that argument for Kamala.  Her statement above is proof that what Biden said the other day was not an accident.  Indeed, he was likely reading off a teleprompter and it is an official position of the US Federal Government at all levels.

This in turn implies they know the vaccines not only have failed they are potentiating infections instead of protecting against them.  Why else would you “protect the vaccinated”?  But wait: Who caused all these people to be put in the position where they are more likely to get ****ed?  That would be the CDC, NIH, Fauci personally and both the Trump and Biden Administrations.

What might be scaring the crap out of them?  Perhaps data like this:

Add to that anecdotal reports in the US so far about people who were fully vaccinated not only winding up in the hospital and dying but crashing very rapidly — somethin that hasn’t happened throughout the time we’ve had Covid-19 here in the United States and which isn’t happening in unvaccinated persons.

Gee, isn’t that something — especially when on the data we also know, and even Fauci has admitted it, that being previously infected and recovered is extraordinarily good protection — far better than that afforded by these vaccines.  He refused to answer said question in a presser the other day.

In other words for the previously-infected the jabs only offer risk, no benefit, exactly as does a HPV shot for a nun, who is in fact celibate and virginal, in a convent.

Now that “potential risk” from not collecting the data before jabbing a huge number of Americans appears to be on the verge of turning into very real and lethal risk!  There is no way to know whether those currently-anecdotal reports will turn into an unavoidable cascade of cases that absolutely nobody will be able to ignore.

Don’t you think we should have figured all of this out before we went on a stabby spree with lightly tested technology that you cannot turn around and undo if it goes badly?  We would have found out and halted what may well be an incipient disaster if we didn’t proceed with “Warp Speed” and instead went through the regular process of gathering that long-term data while allowing the use of these jabs only by those at the highest degree of individual “bad outcome” infection risk (such as residents of nursing homes who have, on average, six months of remaining life and thus long-term risks are, for most of them, irrelevant.)

They tried to kill you and got jabs into 200 million American arms — although whether it was intentional or simply stupidity and greed that drove what happened is up for debate — and now they’re trying to cover it up.

Damnit, Not Again

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

There are times that the “F” word is absolutely appropriate.  For example on August 6th, 1945, by the Mayor of Hiroshima in the instant of time just before he was BBQ’d: What the **** was that?

This is one of those and so I’ll use it without reservation: ****.

A drive-by parade outside of Methodist Mansfield Medical Center last April was supposed to be Corey Ripe’s happy ending. The 47-year-old was headed home after a week on a ventilator battling COVID-19.

Ok, he got Covid, he got it bad in March/April 2020 before we knew what we were doing — but he lived.

Then, January.

Three days later, they got confirmation that, in addition to pneumonia, Ripe had once again contracted the virus that had already nearly claimed his life.

Really?  What was the Ct on that test?  You see, I read that linked article and it describes symptoms that don’t make a lot of sense for Covid-19.  Certainly anything’s possible but the article does make sense for a whole bunch of other infections particularly if he had secondary bacterial pneumonia.  What did the hospital give him?  Nobody has said.  There wasn’t an antibiotic in there by chance, was there?

He then gets vaccinated post-recovery.  Remember, the vaccine prevents severe disease and death, we’re currently told.  We were previously told it prevented getting the virus (that was a lie), that it prevented symptoms (that was a lie), that it prevented giving the virus to others (that was a wild-eyed, entirely-unscientific claim with zero evidence and proved to be a crazy-faced lie as is now showing up everywhere including at all-vaccinated colleges) and now it’s “you won’t go to the hospital or die.”

OH REALLY?  WHERE IS THIS GUY RIGHT NOW?

Still, Saturday night, though he’d shown no prior symptoms, Parris knew it had to be COVID-19 again when she heard the fluid in his lungs.

She rushed him to the ER. And an hour later, Parris got a familiar call.

Ripe was intubated and waiting for an available ICU bed.

I see.

So here are my questions, since this is so wildly improbable that I find it impossible to believe unless something really, really ugly is going on with these jabs.

• At his second alleged infection did the hospital check for both “S” and “N” antibodies at admission?  They should have been present.  You know they didn’t look.  But let’s assume, for the sake of argument, the first infection really was Covid (it’s entirely plausible) and not the flu with a secondary bacterial infection that got him.  I’m not sold on this because H1N1 was going around at that time, I got what I presume was that in January 2020, it did get into my lungs and it flattened me for a week with serious hanging-on symptoms, notably a nasty non-productive cough, that kept hanging on for a month and material cardio impairment for several more (it was worse than Covid-19 which I got first days of August of this year.)  It was bad and I thought, after Covid-19 became known to be a “thing”, I might have had it.  But it was not Covid-19; I know scientifically it was not because a few months later I sourced IgG antibody tests and I was negative.
  
• After the second alleged infection but before he got vaccinated did anyone check for both “S” and “N” antibodies?  You know the answer to that one too.  Of course not.  “If you’re recovered you should still get vaccinated” is what every ******* in the medical and political field has said even though there is zero evidence you get any benefit from doing so and, post-infection, the data is that your protection is many times (13x or more, to be exact) better than getting jabbed.
  
• In any event being an alleged “two-time winner” of the Covid-19 sweepstakes, a statistically unlikely thing to the extreme unless one of the two wasn’t actually Covid, he takes the (bad) advice and gets vaccinated.  Ok, so now he should have both “N” antibodies (from previous infection) and a bunch of “S” ones.
  
• Now a few months later he gets hammered.  Again they say “Covid-19.”  Did they look at admission time for those antibodies this time?  You know damn well they did not and, much worse, this time was extremely rapid onset which strongly implies that VEI may be in the game here.  Yet I’ll bet $1,000 they did not pull antibody titers for both “S” and “N” proteins on admission and given the history I’ll argue that’s not only personal malpractice it’s public-health malpractice and gross negligence.

Here’s why those antibody titers are important especially this time around.

Natural infection provides a higher (by quite a lot) “N” protein titer than “S”.  Why is that?  Because coronaviruses have evolved so their “S” proteins can evade the immune system.  If this was not the case they couldn’t infect you, but obviously they do.  Thus natural infection will produce both but the “N” titer will be higher.

Vaccination produces NO “N” antibodies at all because they’re not encoded in the vaccine.  That’s intentional; the hypothesis that all the vaccine makers in the US used (and in Europe and many other places) operated under was informed by work that was done when SARS was going around.  Vaccines were attempted and they all failed due to ADE-style problems during animal trials.  The belief was that they failed because of the “N” protein in the vaccine.  This was supported by mechanistic (not in-body) work and sounds plausible (I’ve read the work) but the problem is that many times what appears to be “correct” on a mechanistic or test-tube basis doesn’t work that way in the human body.  Since SARS disappeared we never tested this theory on people before Covid-19 showed up because we couldn’t; there was no virus against which to risk natural infections and challenge trials with something like SARS are flat-out nutso given its fatality rate.  The short trials we did do this time around before EUAs issued accounted only for the wild strain that was in circulation at the time; all these other “letters and numbers” mutations were not known as they didn’t exist and thus couldn’t be tested against.  All looked ok, and away we went without any long-term data to back up the claims.  Then we licensed one of them with less than a year’s worth of data to back up the belief that enhancement was off the table.

If this guy has a significant “S” titer, particularly if he has one that is higher than his “N” titer then when he was injected he did produce the expected antibody response.  In other words the expectation is that he had “protection.”  If he has no titer then he is the one dude out of millions that both got nothing in the way of immunity from either infection or vaccination.

But assuming he does have antibodies given his extremely-rapid deterioration this time — from no symptoms to insane deterioration to the point of requiring intubation within a day this time around that implicates VEI in an extremely serious way and in fact until disproved that has to be the presumed reason he got hit that hard, that fast.

This is exactly what VEI (ADE is a subset of VEI, “Vaccine Enhanced Infection”) looks like when it happens folks.  People go from being asymptomatic or only mildly ill to crashing within hours.  The presumption when someone who is vaccinated and has an antibody titer has this sort of thing happen is that is, until conclusively excluded, what you’re dealing with is VEI and it’s a pull the damned alarm right now because the risk of people being imminently ****ed en-masse is on the table sort of event.

If that is what happened then the odds are extremely high that a mutational strain that can tear through the vaccinated population like a wrecking ball is here in the United States — right here, right now.

No bull**** folks.

The only “out” from this scenario if that’s what happened to this individual is that whatever strain he has is disadvantaged on an evolutionary basis and thus will not widely spread and become a material part of the mix.  That is not and cannot be brought under our control.

I Hate Being Right

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

I told you a few weeks ago I was seeing very disturbing data that strongly suggested the jabs were, in some form or fashion, destroying existing immunity or otherwise potentiating more-severe disease.  I didn’t have the hard data to quantify it, but I’ve mentioned the drift in the data streams for some time now.  It was clear and convincing, but not quantifiable.  Until now.

I didn’t then (and still don’t) know the mechanism; I don’t have billions of dollars of lab laying around I can play with.  But on the data it was happening; it was not conclusive but the evidence shift was clear in the data pattern; what had been protection from being harmed if you were jabbed was trending toward neutral in the aggregate and anecdotes suggested harm.

Well, now we have it, and yeah, it’s harm.

Note the right two columns.  They adjust for per-100,000, which is the only accurate way to do it — you must adjust raw rates for the population prevalence of the specific condition under test.

This data shows conclusively that for anyone between 40 and 79 being vaccinated makes it more-likely for you to get Covid-19.

That means what you think it does: If you took the jabs you are the plague rat; you are more-likely to get (and thus transmit) the disease than an unvaccinated person.

Britain had studiously avoided publishing the ranged data like this in their updates until now.  I don’t know why they did it this time but it doesn’t matter.  Their data continues to claim that the jabs are effective in preventing hospitalization and death but the exact opposite is true when it comes to getting Covid-19 which means those who are vaccinated may acquire personal protection but in doing so become Angels of Death to others.

If you have trouble with numerical tables here it is in bar charts:

In addition this is arguably one of the most-immune populations — or should I say allegedly immune — on the planet.  

n this report, we present the results using a 4-weekly average, of testing samples up to 27 August 2021, which takes account of the age and geographical distribution of the English population. Overall, the proportion of the population with antibodies using the Roche N and Roche S assays respectively were 18.1% and 97.7% for the period 2 August to 27 August (weeks 31 to 34) (Figure 3). This compares with 18.2% Roche N seropositivity and 97.0% Roche S seropositivity for the period of 5 July to 30 July (weeks 27 to 30).

In other words 97% of the population has either infection-acquired immunity or vaccination-acquired “alleged” immunity.  That is so close to 100% it is indistinguishable and makes clear that Biden’s actions not only won’t work they can’t because even with effectively 100% coverage Delta continues to go straight through vaccinated individual’s immunity and, as the above data shows, the vaccinated are the ones spreading the virus.  They are literal plague rats killing the unvaccinated who have not seroconverted.

Let me be perfectly-clear: The vaccines are worthless in stopping the acquisition and transmission of disease.  With nearly 100% antibody coverage if the jabs worked at all Britain would be a literal dead-end for anyone who got the virus and it would be gone there.  Cases would be as common as measles; onsie-twosie here and there.  It isn’t gone which is hard, scientific proof that the jabs do not work to stop Covid-19 from circulating in the population and this data proves that in fact it makes infection and transmission more-likely rather than less in very large swaths of the population as a whole.

The seroconversion prevalence by prior infection is very close to the NEJM numbers for the United States.  As such we can expect the same outcome here; if you are seroconverted you are safe and sterile immune but if you are vaccinated and between 40 and 79 you are not only getting Covid you are infecting and killing those who have not seroconverted via infection and in fact are driving both unvaccinated and vaccine-failure infections leading to serious disease and death.

Also, as expected young people are over-represented in having had Covid-19 and thus being presumptively immune.  In the UK for those under 30 that number stands at 27.7%, greater than one in four.  These people have no reason whatsoever to take the jabs as all they offer is personal risk.

The data is clear:

• The jabs are destroying existing immunity in that they have negative effectiveness in preventing infectionamong a wide swath of the population.  If you get (or have been) vaccinated and are between 40 and 79 you are more-likely to acquire a Covid-19 infection and thus be able to spread it than an unvaccinated individual.
  
• The jabs do appear to continue to confer protection against hospitalization and death however this must be, on a public-health basis, compared with what they do to others.  For those who cannot be vaccinated (e.g. immune compromised where the jabs will not “take”, for example) creating a mass of walking plague rats will kill those individuals at a materially higher rate.  Public health is about the aggregate impact on the population.  We made the decision to change the DTP vaccine in children to DTaP because, even though as the latter is non-sterilizing and thus occasionally caused an infant to get infected by his sibling and get very sick or die the aggregate harm was lower than that caused by the DTP vaccine across everyone, including those who needed tetanus boosters and could not get a stand-alone tetanus shot as they are not produced.
  
• The trend toward failure in preventing death is one of deterioration.  While this has not yet accelerated greatly it likely will.  This is due to two problems; the sequencing in public databanks which suggests VEI is just a matter of time and waning antibody titers over time.  These two are are very likely to combine in the months ahead and the probability of them doing so into the maw of flu season this winter is, by my estimation and previous timelines for mutation (e.g. Delta’s emergence in said databanks to it becoming prevalent) is likely odds-on.  If it happens those not previously infected but vaccinated are going to get slaughtered this winter given the above data.  If this is done intentionally by some nation that just-coincidentally doesn’t allow the vaccines that exhibit this problem as we do in in the US, the UK, Israel and similar…..

Let me point out that recombination, which is how someone with a lab would create said “oh crap!” strain, is easy.  It is one of the natural mechanisms by which new strains emerge.  For this reason and because no manual tampering with the virus is necessary to do it proving someone did it and it was a natural event when it happens will be, other than by direct capture and testimony of the persons responsible will be impossible.

There is an argument for those who are specifically-morbid, which is correlated (but not caused) by age to take the jabs.  But for those who are not morbid the data continues to show that while there is no such thing as a risk-free existence and this virus can and occasionally does get people without morbidity it almost-never kills or hospitalizes you.  Mass-vaccinating the healthy, however, winds up killing those who cannot (not by choice, but by medical necessity) take said jabs.

To be blunt: I acquired sterilizing immunity to infection by taking personal risk in that I got Covid-19.  I did not do that intentionally (that would be stupid) but I did prepare for what I considered inevitable, and it occurred.  What I did not do was put others at enhanced risk, which the data now says occurs if you are not previously infected and get jabbed for the benefit of my own protection against severe disease.  I also did not take the risk of the next mutation killing me, a risk that, if vaccinated you cannot un-do once you do it.

The evidence is clear: While we should continue to make available said jabs any form of compulsion is in fact manslaughter since there is a reasonable contingent of persons who, for medical reasons, cannot be vaccinated and thus cannot avail themselves of the option to be protected against hospitalization and death.  In non-morbid people this protection is of little value since the base rate of harm is extremely low.

To repeat: Mass-vaccinating non-morbid people kills the unable-to-be-vaccinated through intentional increase of their risk which exceeds the benefit to the non-morbid vaccinated person.  It is thus not only contrary to public health it can legitimately be considered maliciously so and thus intentional manslaughter or worse.

Joe Biden and your employer, if they go along with it, are trying to kill your immune-compromised child, mother, father or grandparent.

That’s the data and it is likely to get even worse in the weeks and months ahead.

One final thought: If you took the jabs before now, not knowing the above then it is what it is; you were deceived, told this wouldn’t happen and thus are the victim of a bunch of murderous pricks who knew damn well that there was every reason to believe this might happen due to previous attempts to create coronavirus vaccines.  As I said above if you’re materially morbid I can understand the choice, even today, although I think you’re going to seriously regret it, possibly within months.  But if you, as a non-morbid person, irrespective of age, take those jabs now whether of your own free will or a mandate you’re a five-alarm *******, a minion of the Devil, you’re willing to kill others for alleged “protection” that is statistically worth zero to you, I want nothing to do with you as you a monster and I hope you get what you deserve for doing so in this life or the next and it hurts.  That goes double if you give it to your children; they are at statistical zero risk and thus you’re intentionally killing other people and deserve to hang for it.

It Is Time To STRIKE

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

The data is in folks, and the lies are collapsing.

Biden is due to unleash his “six point” plan (the latest iteration) to alleged “Beat Delta.”

You can bet it will contain more mandates.

What it won’t do is recognize these key facts, and thus will fail and will kill Americans unless he is stopped.

• Natural immunity from prior infection is 7-13x, and perhaps as much as 25x as effective as is a vaccine.  This is the data from Israel and multiple studies.  A study from Cleveland Clinic, following more than a thousand of their employees who were infected, found zero reinfections.  Think about that folks — zero so-called “breakthroughs” among previously-infected and not-vaccinated people.
  
• The CDC ITSELF has published their own data that if infected while vaccinated you are equally contagious to someone who was not vaccinated.  Further, contrary to the original claims of the CDC and vaccine makers that the vaccines reduce or eliminate symptomatic infections in virtually every case (95% of the time) they found that 79% of vaccinated people who got infected were symptomatic.  This is statistically identical to unvaccinated persons who sometimes have fully-asymptomatic infections.  If you are vaccinated and get infected you are just as likely to infect (and potentially sicken or kill) another person, vaccinated or not, as someone who is not vaccinated.  This is formally-admissible evidence in court as it is a direct publication of the CDC!  The CDC has admitted, in print, that there is no public-health benefit from the vaccines.
  
• The vaccines are failures.  This should not surprise as every previous coronavirus vaccine attempt also failed.  Yes, they may provide personal protection against serious outcomes for a few months.  The original trials may have been rigged to show that.  The manufacturers deliberately set the dose to produce antibody levels much higher than natural infection.  Why would you do that when, as with any drug, the higher the dose the greater the adverse effects?  The logical reason is that you knew you had to keep protection levels adequate for the four months of the trial and then you intended to unblind the study which immediately destroys the ability to follow up and assess the effect of the vaccine over longer periods of time.  Both Moderna and Pfizer did exactly that and the FDA let them.  Do not be deceived by outright lies in the media; if you don’t know someone who’s fully-vaccinated and got laid out flat on their back or killed by Covid-19, you will.  In Texas at a monoclonal antibody infusion center (where you go if infected and at high risk) the case rate between vaccinated and unvaccinated is statistically identical to Texas’ vaccination rate.  At Duke University where everyone must be vaccinated this year there have been multiple outbreaks.  Cornell has a five times higher case rate now, with everyone vaccinated by mandate, than they did last fall.  There are multiple such examples and they prove the vaccines rapidly become at best worthless.  A “mandate” is thus a demand that you the take the risk of serious injury or death for no reason other than political demand. 
  
• JAMA, the official journal of the American Medical Association, has published proof that the vaccines are at best failures and at worst may be enhancing Covid-19 infections.Specifically, they published a study from blood donations showing the presence of alleged immunity in 83.3% of Americans.  This is sufficient to suppress any virus with an R0 of up to just under 6, and obviously since May it has only climbed.  They did differentiate between antibodies from infection and vaccination, which we can do in this case due to the design of the vaccines.  This study found 20% of Americans have had Covid-19 and are presumptively immune; the balance was from vaccination.  The problem is that if the vaccines worked the summer spike we have seen was impossible, yet it happened.  This is hard proof the vaccines do not work over time; you have taken the risk of serious adverse events up to and including death for a benefit that lasts no more than six months.

Biden will, later today, deny once again that natural infection protects you.  Yet we know, scientifically, it does and about a quarter of the population has had Covid-19.  JAMA has so-proved that 20% of America was immune by natural infection in May of 2021 and obviously the percentage has increased since then.  The CDC claimed (and still does) there were four infections at the lower boundary of their scenarios (e.g. you never went to the doctor or were tested, thus there’s no record) for each Covid-19 infection that they know about.  If the PCR+ tested people all actually had Covid-19 this would have resulted in a 40-50% positive read by JAMA for previous infected and it did not.  Since there is no reason to believe the number of “low symptom or silent” infections is in fact lower than 4:1 (anecdotally — myself, my daughter and my girlfriend all got Covid the first few days of August, we all survived and none of us went to the doctor, hospital or were tested; this is likely quite ordinary) the only reasonable explanation is that a huge percentage of the alleged “PCR+” people never had it.  Elon Musk demonstrated that these tests are horrible back in October of last year when he took four rapid tests in sequence and got two positive and two negative results — no better than a coin flip.

If half the people claimed to have “had it” really didn’t, but were screwed with quarantine orders and similar, the math from the JAMA study works resulting in 20% immune by infection as of May, and about 25% or perhaps even higher now.

Folks, one quarter, approximately, of the population of the United States has had Covid-19 and has no reason to wear a mask, take a jab, or take any other precaution unless, among that group, you are one of the very few — 1 in a thousand — who has a materially-compromised immune system but beat the infection anyway.  If you’re in that group then any infection can kill you and might — including the common flu.

The three key points that the Biden administration and everyone else, including employers, must be forced to recognize and adjust policy to address, are:

• If you have previously been infected — actually infected, not claimed positive by a PCR+ test (e.g. you got distinctively ill and/or have a positive antibody test post-infection) you are presumptively sterile immune to a degree superior to any vaccine.  Not only is there no benefit to you being jabbed but plenty of risk there is the possibility, as is discussed in this paper, that being jabbed may destroy some element of your existing immunity and place you at severe risk of injury or death from other viruses.  Fully one quarter of the American population is in this position.  Among health-care workers the percentage is almost-certainly higher as they labored for roughly a year in direct contact with Covid-19 positive people and, in many cases, known-ineffective (less than an N95) PPE and got infected.  Exactly zero of the previously-infected has any reason to take any of these shots nor wear a mask or otherwise employ “defensive” measures against Covid-19 as every such person is presumptively safe not only against infection but against potentially infecting others.  We must demand OTC, “use in home” access to the existing antibody tests so anyone who had a claimed infection can verify it themselves, in private, and know if they are presumptively safe.  These tests are available now and there is no reason you should not be able to buy one just as people buy pregnancy tests every single day.
  
• If you have not been previously infected then the jabs provide only personal and fleeting protection. We do not know whether or not the risks associated with getting repeatedly jabbed escalate with each successive jab, whether if you do not get adversely impacted you are “safe”, or if something in the middle happens.  You are betting your life that the adverse event rate curve is not exponential and yet there is quite-strong evidence from the first two jabs that it might be.  This must be a personal choice without coercion as if the jabs also degrade existing immunity, and there is emerging evidence they might, you could literally screw yourself into a coffin.
  
• Like it or not we are all eventually going to get Covid-19 and it would be wise to prepare for that before it happens. I said this back in March and April of 2020 and have never wavered from that point.  It remains true.  The correct action, and the only action, is to support immediate treatment upon detection of infection so as to keep people out of the hospital.  Do we have known effective treatments “by the NIH standards” today?  No.  But we have believed ones that are safe, and Americans must be offered the choice on a nationally-mandated basis.  “Right to Try” mandates nothing less since the medical system has nothing approved on offer.  We either take this position or many more people will die.

IF BIDEN DOES NOT, and you know he won’t today, take the three points above as policy then those of us in the health care system and elsewhere who are in that 25% of America that has strong, natural immunity must STRIKE.  We were all sold a bill of LIES in America and elsewhere and the data is irrefutable.  Israel and the UK are being overrun with serious and fatal cases of Covid-19 despite being very highly vaccinated.  The claim that this is all “unvaccinated” people is a lie.

WE MUST SHUT EVERY HOSPITAL DOWN TONIGHT UNTIL BIDEN STOPS THE MASS-SLAUGHTER.

THAT STRIKE MUST BEGIN TONIGHT AND CONTINUE UNTIL THE POLICIES ARE REVERSED.

WE, the people, have ALL the power.  One quarter of the public GOING ON STRIKE will decimate the economy, the markets and every industry across the United States.  It will also INSTANTLY force closed EVERY hospital.

The administration will have NO CHOICE but to capitulate to the American people and STOP the death.

If you don’t do it, America — especially if you’re a health-care worker — every single death after tonight is on your hands.

• Natural immunity from prior infection is 7-13x, and perhaps as much as 25x as effective as is a vaccine.  This is the data from Israel and multiple studies.  A study from Cleveland Clinic, following more than a thousand of their employees who were infected, found zero reinfections.  Think about that folks — zero so-called “breakthroughs” among previously-infected and not-vaccinated people.
  
• The CDC ITSELF has published their own data that if infected while vaccinated you are equally contagious to someone who was not vaccinated.  Further, contrary to the original claims of the CDC and vaccine makers that the vaccines reduce or eliminate symptomatic infections in virtually every case (95% of the time) they found that 79% of vaccinated people who got infected were symptomatic.  This is statistically identical to unvaccinated persons who sometimes have fully-asymptomatic infections.  If you are vaccinated and get infected you are just as likely to infect (and potentially sicken or kill) another person, vaccinated or not, as someone who is not vaccinated.  This is formally-admissible evidence in court as it is a direct publication of the CDC!  The CDC has admitted, in print, that there is no public-health benefit from the vaccines.
  
• The vaccines are failures.  This should not surprise as every previous coronavirus vaccine attempt also failed.  Yes, they may provide personal protection against serious outcomes for a few months.  The original trials may have been rigged to show that.  The manufacturers deliberately set the dose to produce antibody levels much higher than natural infection.  Why would you do that when, as with any drug, the higher the dose the greater the adverse effects?  The logical reason is that you knew you had to keep protection levels adequate for the four months of the trial and then you intended to unblind the study which immediately destroys the ability to follow up and assess the effect of the vaccine over longer periods of time.  Both Moderna and Pfizer did exactly that and the FDA let them.  Do not be deceived by outright lies in the media; if you don’t know someone who’s fully-vaccinated and got laid out flat on their back or killed by Covid-19, you will.  In Texas at a monoclonal antibody infusion center (where you go if infected and at high risk) the case rate between vaccinated and unvaccinated is statistically identical to Texas’ vaccination rate.  At Duke University where everyone must be vaccinated this year there have been multiple outbreaks.  Cornell has a five times higher case rate now, with everyone vaccinated by mandate, than they did last fall.  There are multiple such examples and they prove the vaccines rapidly become at best worthless.  A “mandate” is thus a demand that you the take the risk of serious injury or death for no reason other than political demand. 
  
• JAMA, the official journal of the American Medical Association, has published proof that the vaccines are at best failures and at worst may be enhancing Covid-19 infections.Specifically, they published a study from blood donations showing the presence of alleged immunity in 83.3% of Americans.  This is sufficient to suppress any virus with an R0 of up to just under 6, and obviously since May it has only climbed.  They did differentiate between antibodies from infection and vaccination, which we can do in this case due to the design of the vaccines.  This study found 20% of Americans have had Covid-19 and are presumptively immune; the balance was from vaccination.  The problem is that if the vaccines worked the summer spike we have seen was impossible, yet it happened.  This is hard proof the vaccines do not work over time; you have taken the risk of serious adverse events up to and including death for a benefit that lasts no more than six months.

Biden will, later today, deny once again that natural infection protects you.  Yet we know, scientifically, it does and about a quarter of the population has had Covid-19.  JAMA has so-proved that 20% of America was immune by natural infection in May of 2021 and obviously the percentage has increased since then.  The CDC claimed (and still does) there were four infections at the lower boundary of their scenarios (e.g. you never went to the doctor or were tested, thus there’s no record) for each Covid-19 infection that they know about.  If the PCR+ tested people all actually had Covid-19 this would have resulted in a 40-50% positive read by JAMA for previous infected and it did not.  Since there is no reason to believe the number of “low symptom or silent” infections is in fact lower than 4:1 (anecdotally — myself, my daughter and my girlfriend all got Covid the first few days of August, we all survived and none of us went to the doctor, hospital or were tested; this is likely quite ordinary) the only reasonable explanation is that a huge percentage of the alleged “PCR+” people never had it.  Elon Musk demonstrated that these tests are horrible back in October of last year when he took four rapid tests in sequence and got two positive and two negative results — no better than a coin flip.

If half the people claimed to have “had it” really didn’t, but were screwed with quarantine orders and similar, the math from the JAMA study works resulting in 20% immune by infection as of May, and about 25% or perhaps even higher now.

Folks, one quarter, approximately, of the population of the United States has had Covid-19 and has no reason to wear a mask, take a jab, or take any other precaution unless, among that group, you are one of the very few — 1 in a thousand — who has a materially-compromised immune system but beat the infection anyway.  If you’re in that group then any infection can kill you and might — including the common flu.

The three key points that the Biden administration and everyone else, including employers, must be forced to recognize and adjust policy to address, are:

• If you have previously been infected — actually infected, not claimed positive by a PCR+ test (e.g. you got distinctively ill and/or have a positive antibody test post-infection) you are presumptively sterile immune to a degree superior to any vaccine.  Not only is there no benefit to you being jabbed but plenty of risk there is the possibility, as is discussed in this paper, that being jabbed may destroy some element of your existing immunity and place you at severe risk of injury or death from other viruses.  Fully one quarter of the American population is in this position.  Among health-care workers the percentage is almost-certainly higher as they labored for roughly a year in direct contact with Covid-19 positive people and, in many cases, known-ineffective (less than an N95) PPE and got infected.  Exactly zero of the previously-infected has any reason to take any of these shots nor wear a mask or otherwise employ “defensive” measures against Covid-19 as every such person is presumptively safe not only against infection but against potentially infecting others.  We must demand OTC, “use in home” access to the existing antibody tests so anyone who had a claimed infection can verify it themselves, in private, and know if they are presumptively safe.  These tests are available now and there is no reason you should not be able to buy one just as people buy pregnancy tests every single day.
  
• If you have not been previously infected then the jabs provide only personal and fleeting protection. We do not know whether or not the risks associated with getting repeatedly jabbed escalate with each successive jab, whether if you do not get adversely impacted you are “safe”, or if something in the middle happens.  You are betting your life that the adverse event rate curve is not exponential and yet there is quite-strong evidence from the first two jabs that it might be.  This must be a personal choice without coercion as if the jabs also degrade existing immunity, and there is emerging evidence they might, you could literally screw yourself into a coffin.
  
• Like it or not we are all eventually going to get Covid-19 and it would be wise to prepare for that before it happens. I said this back in March and April of 2020 and have never wavered from that point.  It remains true.  The correct action, and the only action, is to support immediate treatment upon detection of infection so as to keep people out of the hospital.  Do we have known effective treatments “by the NIH standards” today?  No.  But we have believed ones that are safe, and Americans must be offered the choice on a nationally-mandated basis.  “Right to Try” mandates nothing less since the medical system has nothing approved on offer.  We either take this position or many more people will die.

IF BIDEN DOES NOT, and you know he won’t today, take the three points above as policy then those of us in the health care system and elsewhere who are in that 25% of America that has strong, natural immunity must STRIKE.  We were all sold a bill of LIES in America and elsewhere and the data is irrefutable.  Israel and the UK are being overrun with serious and fatal cases of Covid-19 despite being very highly vaccinated.  The claim that this is all “unvaccinated” people is a lie.

WE MUST SHUT EVERY HOSPITAL DOWN TONIGHT UNTIL BIDEN STOPS THE MASS-SLAUGHTER.

THAT STRIKE MUST BEGIN TONIGHT AND CONTINUE UNTIL THE POLICIES ARE REVERSED.

WE, the people, have ALL the power.  One quarter of the public GOING ON STRIKE will decimate the economy, the markets and every industry across the United States.  It will also INSTANTLY force closed EVERY hospital.

The administration will have NO CHOICE but to capitulate to the American people and STOP the death.

If you don’t do it, America — especially if you’re a health-care worker — every single death after tonight is on your hands.

The Lie Of ‘All Unvaccinated’

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

Here’s truth folks….

Remember, you get monoclonal antibodies if infected, symptomatic and at risk of severe outcomes.  When I got Covid-19 last month I did not qualify since I was not any of >65 (58 isn’t good enough), fat, diabetic, hypertensive or one of the few other listed “things” that quality you irrespective of age.  I did not get vaccinated, I got Covid-19 and recovered, obviously, or I wouldn’t be writing this, and now have very strong natural immunity.  At this point I thus have neither any fear of Covid-19 or any reason to be vaccinated.

Got that folks?

The 23 people were all promised they would not get sick as the inducement to get vaccinated.  All 23 of them were symptomatic and at high risk.  Every single one of those people was also exactly as contagious to others as were the 27.

48% of Texas is vaccinated.

46% of these recipients were vaccinated.

There is no statistical difference between the percentage of vaccinated people in the State of Texas and the percentage of people receiving monoclonal antibodies for symptomatic and at-risk-of-severe Covid-19 patients among this group of 50 who are vaccinated.  It is statistically identical.

The debate is over folks.

You were conned America.  You were told to roll up your sleeve and take the risk of clotting disorders, heart damage, heart attacks, strokes and other serious, even life-threatening adverse reactions based on the lie that doing so would (1) prevent you from getting Covid, (2) prevent you from infecting others with Covid, and (3) keep you from having a symptomatic and potentially-serious outcome if exposed to Covid.

All three were LIES and are being repeated to this day by Biden, Fauci, the CDC and your local and State Health Departments.  Any “mandate” predicated on these lies was and is in fact a felony assault with a reasonable expectation of serious bodily harm or death to your person and should have been, and should be today, met with whatever level of force is necessary to cause the person issuing said mandate to STOP on an immediate basis.

THE VACCINES DO NOT PREVENT INFECTION, TRANSMISSION OR THE RISK OF SEVERE OUTCOMES.

ENOUGH!

PS: Before you do something stupid like get a “booster” answer this — why would you believe the third jab will work when you were told the other two would — and the people doing so lied?  When, in addition, there is evidence that the manufacturers knew this would happen and rigged the trials to conceal it?  What data do you have (none!) on whether the risk of serious adverse events rises with each successive injection, if it does by how much (what if it’s exponentially worse?) and why would you be so stupid as to believe a single thing these people say after being screwed by the very same people? I remind you: Never in the past has there been a successful vaccine for coronaviruses.  All previous attempts have failed during trials, which took years to discover, either by mutational escape or worse, enhancement in those who got the injection(s).  Don’t throw your life away.

PPS: Note that there is now emerging evidence of ADE, VEI and/or OAS from the vaccines exactly as has occurred with all other attempts to vaccinate against coronaviruses.  And no, it doesn’t have to be Covid-19 that triggers it either; any other beta coronavirus can plausibly do so.  One of them, OC43, circulates in the population and usually causes mild colds.  Not this time — it sent the person who got it to the hospital and nearly killed them.  Was the vaccine responsible for that?  It might have been and if it got this person it could also get YOU.  There are already cases being reported in the US where the person is vaccinated, presents to the ER with what looks like severe Covid-19 (including the specific markers for Covid such as ground-glass infiltrates in the lungs on X-ray or CT) but repeatedly tests negative.  Here it comes folks….

* VEI – Vaccine-enhanced infection.  Encompasses ADE from vaccines and OAS, along with other related mechanisms such as destruction of existing B-cell recognition.  ADE is a very-specific term and may not be the mechanism by which this is occurring; that has not been determined.

Where Are The Handcuffs?

By Karl Denninger, The Market Ticker

Gee, you think the obvious I pointed out a long time ago — that the double-amine coding in Sars-Cov2 was both a marker commonly used in virology research and had a zero probability of being naturally-occurring in bats because it is not a coding preferred for that amino acid in bats, and thus would not result in an infective virus in said bats, marked the virus as almost-certainly manipulated in a lab?

NEWLY RELEASED documents provide details of U.S.-funded research on several types of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The Intercept has obtained more than nine hundred pages of documents detailing the work of the EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based health organization that used federal money to fund bat coronavirus research at the Chinese laboratory. The trove of documents includes two previously unpublished grant proposals that were funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as well as project updates relating to the EcoHealth Alliance’s research, which has been scrutinized amid increased interest in the origins of the pandemic.

It appears, does it not, that Fauci lied.  Both he and his wife, Christine Grady, who chairs bioethics at the NIH and who “conveniently” has been ignored by the media and everyone else, and who, it must be presumed, any grant proposals would have to go through and be approved by, ought to be in irons right now.

And by the way, exactly how does it happen that in a federal agency a person’s wife winds up in a position to review and formally approve her husband’s work?

Exactly how did that situation arise and why has it been allowed to continue to exist for a very, very long time?  Why weren’t both those *******s driven out of the NIH years ago for what was an obvious intentionally-installed conflict of interest and, since this organization was dealing with things like bat viruses, a potential cause of a global pandemic if and when said conflict wound up approving something that should have been denied and immediately exposed to the public as a intentionally-dangerous act that was blocked?

Why is nobody looking into this?  Why hasn’t it been investigated?

Did it happen?  We don’t know.  It is a reasonably hypothesis, is it not?

Gee, don’t think those are important questions that deserve answers, especially when it turns out that Fauci has repeatedly maintained, both in public and in sworn testimony before Congress that absolutely no “gain of function” research was in fact funded by the NIH under his direction and approval — and that of his wife?